GROWTH CURVES OF LARVAE AND POSTLARVAE OF PINK
SHRIMP, FARFANTEPENAEUS PAULENSIS
R.
Soares, F. D'Incao, S. Peixoto, T. Silva
Abstract:
The Von Bertalanffy (1938) model has been widely used
to describe penaeids shrimp growth. However, initial development phases
(nauplii, protozoea, mysis and postlarvae) seem to follow a different growth
model. The objective of this study was to compare different growth models to
determinate which one represents the best adjust to initial life phases of F.
paulensis. The
growth curves were built using measures of carapace length (CL) of captive
shrimps of 1 to 57 days of life. In the nauplii phase the total length was
measured. Shrimps were obtained by random sampling from a larviculture
conduced in experimental boxes (180 liters), temperature 24 – 2?C,
salinity 28 - 31 and feeding with Artemia nauplii. A total of 284 measures were recorded using
a biological microscope Olympus BX-50.
Von
Bertalanffy Þ Lt = L¥{1-e-K(t-t0)}
Logística
Þ
Lt = L¥/1+c0 e(-Kt)
Gomprtz
Þ Lt = L¥
exp (-c0 e-Kt)
t = age, Lt = length in age t;
K = growth coefficient;
L¥
=
maximum length (assymptotic);
t0 = hypothetical age in which the animal
has size equal to zero;
c0 = mathematical adjustment coefficient;
r = correlation coefficient
Growth curves were calculated using the Microsoft
Excel Solver tool v. 7.0. The Von Bertalanffy and Gompertz’s presented the
best adjustment (r>0.95) to CL observed. However in the Gompertz’s
model we observed that the initial inflection point provides better
adjustment than Bertalanffy’s growth model. The asymptotic length
estimated by Gompertz’s model (L¥
? =
42.9 mm), was similar to the one calculated for F. paulensis adult
population. However the growth coefficient (k=5.8) was considered
overestimated, probably due high growth rate characteristic of the initial
penaeid life stages. Although Von Bertalanffy’s model has been used with
success for F. paulensis juvenile and adult, Gompertz’s model is more
effective to early stages. These results suggest that one single
mathematical model could not be applied to describe shrimp growth from
hatching to adult size.
(Laboratorio de Crustáceos Decapodos, Departamento
de Oceanografia, Fundaçao Universidade
do rio Grande – FURG, CP 474, Rio Grande, Brasil, e-mail: Roberta@mikrus.com.br)